Ultimate magazine theme for WordPress.

Solar storms could be more extreme if they ‘slipstream’ behind each other


Solar storms could be more extreme if they ‘slipstream’ behind each other
The 23 July 2012 event recorded by STEREO

Modeling of an extreme space weather event that narrowly missed Earth in 2012 shows it could have been even worse if paired with another event.

The findings suggest weather predictions should be updated to include how close events enhance one another.

Coronal mass ejections (CMEs) are eruptions of vast amounts of magnetized material from the sun that travel at high speeds, releasing a huge amount of energy in a short time. When they reach Earth, these trigger amazing auroral displays, but can disrupt power grids, satellites and communications.

These most extreme of “space weather” events have the potential to be catastrophic, causing power blackouts that would disable anything plugged into a socket and damage to transformers that could take years to repair. Accurate monitoring and predictions are therefore important to minimizing damage.

Now, a research team led by Imperial College London have shown how CMEs could be more extreme than previously thought when two events follow each other. Their results are published today in a special issue of Solar Physics focusing on space weather.

Technological blackouts

The team investigated a large CME that occurred on 23 July 2012 and narrowly missed Earth by a couple of days. The CME was estimated to travel at around 2,250 kilometers per second, making it comparable to one of the largest events ever recorded, the so-called Carrington event in 1859. Damage estimates for such an event striking Earth today have run into the trillions of dollars.

Lead author Dr. Ravindra Desai, from the Department of Physics at Imperial, said: “The 23 July 2012 event is the most extreme space weather event of the space age, and if this event struck Earth the consequences could cause technological blackouts and severely disrupt society, as we are ever more reliant on modern technologies for our day-to-day lives. We find however that this event could actually have been even more extreme—faster and more intense—if it had been launched several days earlier directly behind another event.”

To determine what made the CME so extreme, the team investigated one of the possible causes: the release of another CME on the 19 July 2012, just a few days before. It has been suggested that one CME can “clear the way” for another.

CMEs travel faster than the ambient solar wind, the stream of charged particles constantly flowing from the sun. This means the solar wind exerts drag on the traveling CME, slowing it down.

However, if a previous CME has recently passed through, the solar wind will be affected in such a way that it will not slow down the subsequent CME as much. This is similar to how race car drivers ‘slipstream’ behind one another to gain a speed advantage.

Magnifying extreme space weather events

The team created a model that accurately represented the characteristics of the 23 July event and then simulated what would happen if it had occurred earlier or later—i.e. closer to or further from the 19 July event.

They found that by the time of the 23 July event the solar wind had largely recovered from the 19 July event, so the previous event had little impact. However, their model showed that if the latter CME had occurred earlier, closer to the 19 July event, then it would have been even more extreme—perhaps reaching speeds of up to 2750 kilometers per second or more.

Han Zhang, co-author and student who worked on the development of this modeling capability, said: “We show that the phenomenon of “ preconditioning,” where an initial CME causes a subsequent CME to travel faster, is important for magnifying extreme space weather events. Our model results, showing the magnitude of the effect and how long the effect lasts, can contribute to current space weather forecasting efforts.”

The sun is now entering its next 11-year cycle of increasing activity, which brings increased chances of Earth-bound solar storms. Emma Davies, co-author and Ph.D. student, said: “There have been previous instances of successive solar storms bombarding the Earth, such as the Halloween Storms of 2003. During this period, the sun produced many solar flares, with accompanying CMEs of speeds around 2000 km/s. These events damaged satellites and communication systems, caused aircraft to be re-routed, and a power outage in Sweden. There is always the possibility of similar or worse scenarios occurring this next solar cycle, therefore accurate models for prediction are vital to help mitigate their effects.”

“Three Dimensional Simulations of Solar Wind Preconditioning and the 23 July 2012 Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejection,” by Ravindra Desai, Han Zhang, Emma Davies, Julia Stawarz, Joan Mico-Gomez and Pilar Iváñez-Ballesteros, is published in Solar Physics.

A method to study extreme space weather events

More information:
Ravindra T. Desai et al. Three-Dimensional Simulations of Solar Wind Preconditioning and the 23 July 2012 Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejection, Solar Physics (2020). DOI: 10.1007/s11207-020-01700-5

Solar storms could be more extreme if they ‘slipstream’ behind each other (2020, September 29)
retrieved 29 September 2020
from https://phys.org/news/2020-09-solar-storms-extreme-slipstream.html

This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Source link

Comments are closed.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More


Now you can take action to help the World Health Organization detect, prevent and respond to the coronavirus by giving to the COVID-19 Solidarity Response Fund.